Environment

TCFD measures

Basic approach

Climate change is an imminent threat to the life of humanity and the health of the planet. It will also affect our business, our customers and our supply chain. The scientific assessment from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) clearly shows that global warming is caused by human emissions of GHG*1 and calls for urgent deep decarbonization.

We believe businesses have an important role in fighting climate change. We recognize that climate change presents both risks of increased cost and disruption for our business as well as new opportunities for Murata to create value while meeting the needs of society. The next decade presents immense opportunities to expand our business into new domains, while living out Murata’s mission of contributing to the advancement of society by creating innovative products and solutions.

Murata endorsed recommendations by the TCFD established by the FSB*2. We will analyze risks and opportunities brought on by climate change and work to disclose information related to governance and strategies in accordance with the TCFD recommendations.
The followings outlined Murata’s efforts in the four thematic areas specified in the TCFD recommendations, namely, governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.

Link: Create a decarbonized society

Image of TCFD's logo
Murata Group's approach Progress of fiscal 2025 initiatives
Governance
  • The Board of Directors has overall accountability for the management of all risks and opportunities including climate change, and supervises the Climate Change Committee and others upon receiving reports from them on measures and decisions
  • The Sustainability Committee is chaired by the President and oversees the Climate Change Committee. The Climate Change Committee, chaired by the Executive Deputy President, reports on climate change countermeasures to the Sustainability Committee twice a year and promotes initiatives at the management level.
  • Progress management of environment targets and review of decarbonization-related investment decisions
  • Responsible department promotes company-wide climate change prevention measures based on the decisions made by the Climate Change Committee
  • Introduction of a remuneration system with remuneration fluctuating based on the achievement level of social value targets, including climate change measures, for part of the officers' stock-based compensation (excluding Audit and Supervisory Committee Members, etc.)
  • The Climate Change Committee held three meetings (including special meetings)
    Subjects reviewed:
    • Internal and external trends surrounding product CFP*3, and initiatives to further improve data accuracy
    • Status of energy-saving promotion activities and setting of new energy-saving targets
    • Introduction of on-site solar power generation equipment to business sites and renewable-electricity procurement from off-site sources
    • Consideration of category-level and an overall roadmap and measures for reducing Scope 3 emissions and improving data accuracy
Strategy
  • Set “Create a decarbonized society” as one of the priority issues (materiality)
    • Formulate Scope1,2 GHG emission reduction target (1.5°C) and Scope3 GHG emission reduction target (WB 2°C) in conformity with the Paris Agreement (SBT*4-certified)
  • Approaches for reducing Scope1 and 2 toward the attainment of medium- to long-term goals:
    • Join RE100*5 and formulate a long-term plan for introducing renewable energy for business use
    • Reinforce active efforts for renewable energy and energy saving measures that utilize the sustainability investment promotion system (including the internal carbon pricing system)
  • Implemented measures for achieving the medium-term targets established in Vision2030
  • Promoted the visualization and improved data accuracy of GHG emissions per unit of product (product CFP), with disclosure to customers on request
  • Conducted supplier briefings and interviews for the reduction of Scope 3 emissions, and implemented modal shifts
  • Environmental value purchase agreements with additionality, currently in operation:
    • A V-PPA*6 with Mitsubishi Corporation and Renova, Inc., based on a solar power plant
    • A V-PPA with Cosmo Eco Power Co., Ltd., based on a wind power plant
Risk management
  • Incorporate risks deriving from climate change into the group-wide risk management items under the Risk Management Committee and identify and assess them as major risks for the group. Match with risks based on scenario analysis, and monitor efforts
  • Extract all transition risks and physical risks that derive from climate change impact. Assess the impact level of each risk
  • For the operation aspect, obtain ISO 14001 certification for offices and promote continuous improvements while assessing environmental risks
  • Implemented and disclosed risk/opportunity analysis according to transition and physical scenarios
  • Applied the internal system “sustainability investment promotion system” as a measure for introducing carbon pricing in different countries
  • Captured the global trends related to climate change and applied them to corporate efforts and countermeasures
Metrics and targets Fiscal 2050 target
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2,3): Carbon neutral
Fiscal 2040 target
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2): Carbon neutral
Fiscal 2035 target
  • Renewable energy sourcing: 100%
Fiscal 2030 targets
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2): 873 kt-CO2e (46% reduction vs FY2019)
  • GHG emissions (Scope3): 3,246 kt-CO2 (27.5% reduction vs FY2019)
  • Renewable energy sourcing: 75%
Fiscal 2025 performance
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2): 938 kt-CO2e (42% reduction vs FY2019)
  • GHG emissions (Scope3): 3,860 kt-CO2 (14% reduction vs FY2019)
  • Renewable energy sourcing: 45.9%
  • *1

    GHG: Greenhouse gas. Gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect.

  • *2

    Financial Stability Board.

  • *3

    CFP is an abbreviation of Carbon Footprint of Products. It calculates the amount of GHG emitted throughout the entire lifecycle.

  • *4

    SBT (Science Based Targets): Science-based greenhouse gas emission reduction targets in accordance with the Paris Agreement.

  • *5

    RE100: An international initiative administered through a partnership between the international NGO called “The Climate Group” and CDP in which globally influential companies aim for 100% renewable energy.

  • *6

    V-PPA (Virtual Power Purchase Agreement): An arrangement under which a company trades the environmental value derived from renewable energy without physical delivery of electricity.

  • *7

    Data for FY 2025 are provisional values as of June 2026.

Governance

Murata is strengthening its governance system for climate change measures. The Board has overall accountability for the management of all risks and opportunities, including climate change. Our President and an Executive Deputy President, who are Executive Directors of the Board, chair Murata’s Sustainability Committee and Climate Change Committee respectively and are ultimately accountable for the oversight of our climate change agenda.

The Climate Change Committee is responsible for governing Murata’s overall strategies in response to climate change and monitoring the delivery of climate-related objectives across the Murata group of businesses. The Climate Change Committee reports its activity track records to the Sustainability Committee, which is an upper-level organization, and the Sustainability Committee reports these results to the Board of Directors for discussion. The Board of Directors takes the risks and opportunities that occur due to climate change into consideration, and directs business plans and business strategies while considering related policies and current initiatives of Murata.
In addition, a Presidential award and Committee award system was established for initiatives to reduce GHG emissions at each office as part of our incentives. These awards are primarily given for cases selected according to economic efficiency, reasonableness, and other unique standards adopted by Murata based on GHG reduction through energy saving and renewable energy.

Chaired by the Executive Deputy President, the Climate Change Committee is composed of responsible people of Manufacturing Department, Research and Development Department, Environment Department, Sales Department, and other business units. Meetings are held two or more times per year to make decisions on matters for discussion proposed by the subcommittees. Meetings concerning specific themes are also held on an ad hoc basis as the themes occur. The Committee holds discussions on Murata’s climate change strategy with three subcommittees: the Climate Initiatives/Scope 3 Subcommittee, the Renewable Energy Subcommittee, and the Energy-saving Subcommittee. In FY2025, the discussions included initiatives to improve the accuracy of product CFP data, consideration of new energy-saving targets, the introduction of on-site solar power generation equipment at business sites, and renewable-electricity procurement from off-site sources, as well as a roadmap for reducing Scope 3 emissions.

Major reports and resolutions made in FY2025 by the Board of Directors regarding climate change measures include the following:

  • Results against the medium-term targets set under the “Reinforcement of climate change countermeasures” materiality up to FY2024
  • Setting of single-year evaluation indicators and targets against the medium-term targets set under the “Create a decarbonized society” materiality, in effect from FY2025
  • Initiatives in the environmental area aimed at the virtuous cycle of social value and economic value
  • Sharing of progress on initiatives to achieve RE100
TCFD governance system diagram

Link: Murata’s Corporate Governance System

Subcommittees

■Climate Initiatives/Scope 3 Subcommittee: Established in 2019. The Climate Initiatives Subcommittee is led by the General Manager of the Environment Department, and the Scope 3 Subcommittee is led by the General Manager of the Procurement Department; both are composed of senior managers from related departments. In addition to considering the implementation of climate-related strategies, they share successful cases of cross-departmental coordination and initiatives. To further advance Scope 3 reduction measures, related members were added to the subcommittees, and from FY2025, the organization was restructured into a two-subcommittee system under the new name Climate Initiatives/Scope 3 Subcommittee.
Fiscal 2025 results

  • Sharing updates on responses to sustainability disclosure regulations such as CSRD and SSBJ
  • Consideration of category-level and an overall roadmap and measures for reducing Scope 3 emissions and improving data accuracy

■Renewable Energy Subcommittee: Established in 2021 Led by senior managers of the Battery Department, Business Development Department, Environment Department, etc. Since joining “RE100,” considers initiatives to promote the introduction of renewable energy across the company such as the maximum introduction of solar power generation where possible at domestic business sites and long-term procurement contracts of power based on renewable energy.
Fiscal 2025 results

  • Efforts along the roadmap to the achievement of 100% renewable energy sourcing
  • Studied procurement of renewable energy from outside the premises and made into actions

■Energy-saving Subcommittee: Established in 2022 Led by the Environment Department as well as senior managers of each division and business sites. Murata believes continued energy saving is crucial to reduce GHG emissions, and the subcommittee promotes visualization of energy consumption and GHG emissions from product development to manufacturing as well as energy saving measures.
Fiscal 2025 results

  • Status of energy-saving assessments at each business site, consideration of more effective internal implementation structures, and consideration of new energy-saving targets
  • The Murata Group implemented 1,140 energy-saving measures (as cumulative total across business sites, expected to deliver an annual reduction equivalent to approximately 120 kt-CO2e)
  • * Data for FY 2025 are provisional values as of June 2026.

Strategy

Murata identifies climate change countermeasures as critical issues for a manufacturing company and sets “Create a decarbonized society” as one of the materiality issues in Vision2030 and the medium-term management plan. By capturing climate change in both aspects of opportunity and risk, Murata seeks to practice corporate social responsibility and establish further competitiveness.

Murata analyzed risks and opportunities in the two scenarios announced by IPCC*1 and IEA*2, namely “4°C or higher global average temperature increase” and “keeping the global average temperature increase to below 2°C (1.5°C or below in some parts), agreed upon in the Paris Agreement.” As a result, beginning in FY2025, we revised our longstanding climate-change priority issue to “Create a decarbonized society,” with the intention of contributing not only to our own decarbonization but also to the decarbonization of society as a whole. As specific initiatives, Murata will continuously promote product development with competitiveness in terms of smaller size, higher efficiency, and longer service life in order to respond to the demand for high-efficiency parts required for changes in society, such as increasing energy saving and renewable energy needs, the transition in automotive industry related to the shift to EVs, and further speed and capacity increase in information communications infrastructure. Murata also aims to contribute to a decarbonized society and explore new business opportunities by rolling out energy saving and renewable energy measures both internally and externally, combining the solar power generation system introduced at Murata sites and Murata products such as storage batteries and energy management systems.
We review TCFD risks and opportunities as appropriate. Scenario analysis results will inform future management plan strategies, leading to concrete action plans.

  • *1

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

  • *2

    International Energy Agency (IEA)

■Summary of analysis■

Transition opportunity/risk analysis
Item Analysis conditions
Target World in 2030 with a view to 2050
Adopted scenarios
  • 4°C scenario: IPCC RCP 8.5, IEA/STEPS
  • 1.5/2°C scenario: IPCC RCP 1.9 and 2.6, IEA/SDS (partly IEA/NZE)
Timing Short-term: Within the next 3years, Medium-term: Within 3 to 5 years, Long-term: 5 to 10 years
Impact levels Large: 20 billion+ JPY, Medium: 10 billion JPY to 19.9 billion JPY, Small: Below 10 billion JPY
Scenario analysis target Current business
Critical transition risks and action policies
Climate change element Item Action policy Impact level*4
Transition risk Increase in decarbonized product needs
Short to medium-term*3
Customer loss due to incapability to respond to decarbonization needs
  • Continuous product development with competitiveness in terms of smaller size, higher efficiency, and longer service life
  • Reduction in GHG emissions in collaborations with suppliers
  • Active introduction of renewable energy for the promotion of decarbonization in the manufacturing process
  • Disclosure of product CFP to customers with strong environmental interest, together with consideration of further improvements in data accuracy
High
Increase in environmental awareness
Short to medium-term*3
Deterioration of corporate value due to changes in investors' criteria
  • Continuous dialogues with investors
  • Timely and appropriate disclosure of information through the TCFD framework or CDP
  • Climate Change Committee monitors the progress of achievement of environment management targets
Low
Stricter energy saving standards
medium to long-term*3
Increase in plant building and operating costs
  • Decrease in cost burden through active use of energy saving subsidies and preferential tax treatment
  • Offsetting increased building costs by reducing running costs through energy saving
  • Active adoption of low-environmental burden building materials for constructing plants
High
Strained balance between mineral supply and demand
medium to long-term*3
Increase in material procurement costs due to the strained balance between the supply of and demand for rare metals, etc.
  • Efforts to reduce the amount of materials used, associated with downsizing of products
  • Recycling process efforts and exploration of alternatives
Medium
Introduction of carbon pricing
medium to long-term*3
Increase in fuel and power costs
  • Energy saving efforts at manufacturing sites
  • Reduction in fossil fuel-derived power consumption due to active introduction of renewable energy
  • New attempts at realizing alternative energy sources, such as using hydrogen
  • Introduction of internal carbon pricing system in fiscal 2021 aimed at promoting investments in energy saving and renewable energy measures
Medium
Instability in power supply due to active implementation of renewable energy
medium to long-term*3
Loss of business opportunities due to insufficient BCP response
  • Enrichment of BCP at individual manufacturing sites
  • Ensuring a backup system at key manufacturing sites
Low
Critical transition opportunities and action policies
Climate change element Item Action policy Impact level*4
Transition opportunity Increase in decarbonized product needs
Short to medium-term*3
Increase in the demand for high added-value, low-power consumption devices
  • Provision of the latest electronic parts that contribute to the evolution of hardware
  • Continuous product development with competitiveness in terms of smaller size, higher efficiency, and longer service life
High
Expansion of business opportunities due to supporting energy saving and renewable energy needs
  • Contribution to a decarbonized society through battery and power supply business
  • Promote stakeholders' understanding of the competitiveness of energy saving and renewable energy efforts of Murata's products through information disclosure based on TCFD and participation in environmental initiatives (RE100, SBT, CDP responses)
  • Creation of new businesses related to energy saving and renewable energy
  • Environmental monitoring using modules and sensors (in-house technologies)
Medium
Progression of EV shift
Short to medium-term*3
Increase in the demand for electronic parts for automobiles (CASE) and automobile infrastructure
  • Acquisition of opportunities due to the expansion of the parts market associated with the shift to EVs
  • Provision of new value including software solutions drawing on findings in the field of communications
  • Exploration of business opportunities in the Out-Car area
High
Progress in the social implementation of information infrastructure*5
Short to medium-term*3
Increase in the demand for electronic parts for high-speed, large-capacity communications and sensing society
  • Promotion of the development of products that can respond to the technical requirements for the upcoming 6G society
  • Efforts for low power consumption and reduced loss
  • Continuous development of sensing techniques and devices
High
Energy saving and improved efficiency in business operations
Short to medium-term*3
Reduction in power costs through introducing renewable energy and storage battery facilities in plants and promoting energy saving
  • Promotion of energy saving efforts at manufacturing sites
  • Reduction in costs to purchase non-fossil fuel-derived power by actively introducing renewable energy and storage batteries
Low
Physical risk analysis
Impact is analyzed with the support of Weathernews Inc.
Item Analysis conditions
Target World in 2050
Adopted scenarios IPCC RCP 2.6, RCP4.5, RCP 8.5
Climate models/data sets AQUEDUCT (flood/storm surge), d4pdf (strong wind), CMIP6*6 (extreme heat)
Timing Medium-term: 2030, Long-term: 2050
Analysis target 20 major manufacturing sites and offices primarily in Japan, China, and Southeast Asia (covering 80% based on the number of employees in the Group)
Specific risks Among the 10 climate hazards (extreme typhoons and extreme heat, extreme drought and landslide, extreme rainfall flood and sea-level rise, extreme precipitation, storm surge, river flood or snowmelt), those that are estimated to affect Murata significantly were chosen (flood/storm surge, extreme heat, strong wind) for verification of financial impact on Murata’s business activities. We are planning to analyze the impact on the whole value chain, such as suppliers and product transportation while also improving on the accuracy of verification results.
Physical risks and action policy
Natural disaster Mitigation measures Impact level*4 *7
Physical risks Extreme heat
  • Energy saving: Initiatives to lower our demand for electricity, a major source of our GHG emissions
  • Renewable energy: Efforts for introducing solar power generation and storage batteries and for procurement of renewable energy
    Link: Integrated renewable energy control solution efinnosOpen in New Window
  • Internal systems: An internal carbon pricing system was introduced in 2021 to align investment decision-making with Murata's commitment to GHG emissions reduction
  • Targets: Joined RE100, committing to sourcing 75% renewable energy by 2030 and 100% by 2035. Established Scope 1, 2 and 3 reduction targets in conformance with SBT standards, and aims to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
Medium
Flood / Storm surge Low
Strong wind Low
  • *3

    Short-term: Within the next 3 years, Medium-term: Within the next 3 to 5 years, Long-term: Within the next 5 to 10 years

  • *4

    Impact levels: Large: 20 billion+ JPY, Medium: 10 billion to 19.9 billion JPY, Small: Below 10 billion JPY

  • *5

    Elements that indirectly constitute opportunities

  • *6

    Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) is a collaborative framework led by World Climate Research Program (WCRP) with the aim to foster climate model improvements and support national and international assessments of climate change impact.

  • *7

    Annual impact considering recurrence interval

Value-at-Risk (VaR)

  • Reflects the estimated financial loss that can incur to the selected portfolio or asset in a year, with a certain probability, if all the estimated hazard events occur under the considered scenarios and period.
  • This analysis uses Murata’s proprietary information to calculate VaR based on the following two aspects:
  • Loss from damages to assets: assessed by referencing past events, type of asset, total value of assets, etc.
  • Loss from business interruption: assessed based on the number of days of business stoppage due to disaster

As a result of analysis based on Murata’s proprietary information, VaR is ten billion yen to several tens of billions of yen (around 10% of Murata’s current income in fiscal 2025). We are planning more in-depth analysis and its reflection into more specific business strategies.
Our Business Continuity Plan (BCP) aims to minimize the impact of hazards on our operations.

Link: Business Continuity Plan

Risk management

The Sustainability Committee regularly evaluates the materiality of a wide range of social, environmental, and economic issues through a structured process. In the most recent materiality assessment, climate change was recognized as a critical risk and endorsed by the Board of Directors as a materiality for “Create a decarbonized society,” identifying management oversight and actions for this materiality as an important management issue.
Link: Identifying material issues

On a strategic level, the Climate Change Committee provides oversight on Murata’s climate change agenda, including the continuous monitoring of evolving climate-related risks.
To evaluate the potential risks and opportunities posed by future climate change and the resilience of our business strategy, we have been continuously conducting in-depth analyses of physical scenarios and transition scenarios since fiscal 2021. Other efforts include a full-scale introduction of the sustainability investment promotion system in fiscal 2022, and decarbonization initiatives with the perspective of unprecedented discontinuous challenges, including the adoption of the internal carbon pricing system. Aiming to refine and reduce Scope3 initiatives, we have continuously given briefings for decarbonization targeting more than 230 companies in Japan and interviews with suppliers. As a result, we were able to increase the primary data percentage of Category 1 GHG emissions up to 28.9%.

At the operational level, our business sites have obtained ISO 14001 certification and drive continuous improvement while assessing environmental and climate change risks. Since 2018, Murata has also been capturing the latest information on global climate change in a timely manner through its regular membership with Japan Climate Leaders' Partnership (JCLP) and has applied it to corporate efforts and actions.

Risks arising from climate change are incorporated into company-wide enterprise risk register under the supervision of the Risk Management Committee. For example, guidelines for responding to severe weather conditions are provided in our Business Continuity Plan (BCP) to minimize business disruption.
Link: Reinforcing risk management

Our participation in industry associations, such as JCLP and JEITA, and global alliances, such as RE100, can help us gather insights into emerging risks and opportunities related to climate change.
For the participation in an industry association or the review thereof, in line with its commitment to the Paris Agreement, Murata periodically checks for any significant discrepancies or deviations from the missions of the industry association in light of conformity with Murata’s aims and business activities. Withdrawal will be considered if conformity with their mission became difficult.

  • * Data for FY 2025 are provisional values as of June 2026.

Metrics and targets

In order to contribute to global initiatives to limit the average temperature increase to 1.5°C, Murata acquired SBT certification.
Specifically, we have set Scope1,2 and Scope3 GHG emissions targets according to the 1.5°C scenario and WB 2°C scenario, respectively.
As a member of RE100, we have also committed to achieving 75% renewable energy by 2030 and 100% by 2035.
(Refer to ESG Data Collection / Reference Tables for a breakdown of GHG emissions by scope/category.)
Under Medium-term Direction 2027, which took effect in FY2025, we established a strategic investment line of 220 billion yen as capital allocation for the three years from 2025 to 2027. Within this, we have secured a budget for environmental investments, including long-term climate change measures, and we are steadily investing to achieve these goals.
Link: Medium-term Direction 2027

Murata Group’s environment targets (Create a decarbonized society)
Our Vision for 2030

To realize a sustainable global environment through co-creation with stakeholders and to spread it to our own business and to society.

Medium- to long-term goals
FY2027 targets
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2): 976 kt-CO2e (39% reduction vs FY2019)
  • GHG emissions (Scope3): Data refinement
  • Renewable energy sourcing: 55%
FY2030 targets
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2): 873 kt-CO2e (46% reduction vs FY2019)
  • GHG emissions (Scope3): 3,246 kt-CO2 (27.5% reduction vs FY2019)
  • Renewable energy sourcing: 75%
FY2035 target
  • Renewable energy sourcing: 100%
FY2040 target
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2): Carbon neutral
FY2050 target
  • GHG emissions (Scope1,2,3): Carbon neutral
Trend of total GHG emissions and renewable energy sourcing rate, and medium- to long-term targets
  • * Data for FY 2025 are provisional values as of June 2026.